I wrote this Educational
Philosophy statement twenty years ago. It still rings true. The
important things I learned about schooling, I learned from students.
**********************************
The
most influential architects of my educational philosophy have been young men
and women whose names do not grace the pages of famous pedagogical works. As I continue to learn from these young
scholars, my attitudes and insights about schools and education evolve. Certainly however there are principles which
do not waver:
·
There are no ‘throw away’ kids.
·
Applied learning is more effective than rote.
·
Students are often capable of more than we ask of them.
·
Schools must be physically, emotionally, and intellectually safe for
all.
Yet
some students’ experiences have been particularly enlightening for me and from
them I have learned much about schools and schooling. Some of the important lessons they have
taught me follow.
Will was a new student short on
credits. He was skipping classes
regularly and earning few grades above F. One morning I sat with Will and gained an insight into his
hopelessness. Will hadn’t made many new
friends and did not feel welcome at his new school. When a teacher made a discouraging comment to
him, he stopped attending. Occasionally Will motivated himself to return. When he did, he encountered comments such as “Nice
you could join us” and “What did you come back for?” He became further convinced he was
unwelcome. If providing education to all
comers is our mission, then school climate is its foundation. We must have schools that are friendly, safe,
and purposeful. We must ensure that all
students have an equal playing field with full knowledge of our rules and the
resources available to them. We must
also continue believing in kids even when they stop believing in themselves.
Josh was
not considered a scholar. His academic
course grades were nearly all C’s and D’s.
He invested little in those classes and seemed to absorb little of what
they had to offer. But all I had to do
was see the aluminum fishing boat Josh built to realize that his was an
extraordinary talent. Josh’s skill and
attention to detail marked him as a true craftsman. We educators need to look for students’ talents
and for ‘hooks’ to tie curriculum to their experiences and interests. We must also communicate that one category of
talent is not superior to another. Our
devoted musicians, our mechanics, our artists, and our caring, sensitive souls
are not inferior to our best writers and mathematicians.
Lisa
was a brilliant young mathematician. The surprising fact about Lisa was that she could not name large
numbers. Yet unless you asked her “How
do you say 22,486?” this problem would go unnoticed. She could still perform incredible
mathematics with numbers of any size. Some might bemoan the fact that her teachers had not drilled her
sufficiently on number naming. I
instead commend the teachers who continued to challenge Lisa, allowing her the
excitement of new math concepts, while reinforcing number naming
periodically. We must be careful, for
the sake of students like Lisa, that our education is not overly
deficiency-based.
Crystal wrote
often of her plans to abolish world hunger and ensure world peace. Then in her junior year, Crystal worked on a service learning project
with Women’s Crisis Support Team researching dating violence and developing
presentations for middle school students. The presentations went well and Crystal
was later contacted privately by several younger girls. “I wanted to help the world,” Crystal
commented afterwards, “I didn’t realize I could do it right here.” Crystal at 23 is a very effective VISTA
worker serving adolescent girls. When
we connect students to their community, we disconnect them from the alienation
of adolescence. Both service learning
and the effective use of community resource people enrich our curriculum, give
students a chance to apply their skills in meaningful ways, and invite them
into the adult world. Every course can
be a lab course if the community is our laboratory.
Bryan was an amazingly talented young
man who barely qualified to graduate. Bryan was one of the best
speakers and debaters in the league, a great actor, and led the mock trial team
to second-place at state. He had an
encyclopedic mind, a marvelous wit, and asked questions that probed way beyond
our curriculum. Bryan had a hard time though completing
mundane, unchallenging work. The easier
the course, the lower his grade. By
raising the bar and expecting more from students, paradoxically we increase our
success rate. I learned from Bryan that some students
need intellectual challenge and many are at their best in competitive
situations. When we provide
opportunities for academic competition, students discover their capabilities. Bryan
was also gifted in his ability to pull the best from his teammates and he
taught me to look beyond the obvious candidates when we recruit for academic
teams.
Megan was appalled when a friend was
beaten badly at school by a notorious group of bullies. She questioned why 5 students were allowed to
terrorize the rest of the student body.
Megan was the first president of SAVVE (Students Against Violence and
Vandalism Everywhere) and proved that if students choose to protect victims
instead of bullies, they can turn a school around. In SAVVE’s first year at IVHS, intimidation,
harassment, and vandalism disappeared. Goals which adults seem helpless to accomplish on our own are achievable
when we partner with kids. We can have a
school where everyone is safe to be themselves and to learn.
S.A.V.V.E., Illinois Valley High School, c. 1985 |
Jennifer was in many ways an ideal
student. She was endlessly inquisitive,
craved connections between what she learned in various disciplines, and thought
and wrote analytically. A straight “A”
student, Jennifer hoped to study history at Stanford. Her SAT scores however were not good enough and she
was rejected. Over the phone, the
admissions officer asked if she might be an overachiever. When our assessment tools do not accurately
reflect performance, why do we question the performance? There is a danger in ignoring the limitations
of standardized tests. Measurable
outcomes are valuable indicators, but sometimes the least measurable are the
most significant.
At the age of 14, James
came to us with a history that included the loss of his father in a gun battle,
abandonment by his mother, sexual abuse, early drug exposure, severe physical
abuse from his older cousins, and domestic violence. James’ anger was usually just below the surface
and he trusted no one, least of all adults in authority. Through many difficult conversations, James
taught me that the gulf between most of us in education and many of our
students is indeed wide. In the past, it
was enough that we tried to help them to cross the chasm and be like us. That is no longer sufficient. We must listen more carefully and try harder
to understand our students’ realities if we want to reach them. Sometimes we have to push students like
James out to protect our other students. It would be far better to teach him the resiliency skills that will
protect him from further violence and self-destruction.
With apologies to the likes of John Dewey, Maria Montessori, Howard Gardner, and
Robert Hutchins, I have found that many firmaments in my educational philosophy
bear the names of much younger scholars. I look forward to my continuing education at the hands of such able
instructors.
Note:
Names have been changed to protect individual identities. These students
come from all three high schools in the Three Rivers School District:
Illinois Valley HS, Hidden Valley HS and North Valley HS.
Comments
Post a Comment
I'm interested in your comments.